Later they graciously gave us a bunch of “free” DPS publications included with CC to use that as an argument to get people to subscribe. My suspicion is that Adobe management purposely held back that feature because they wanted to sell that horrible but more profitable DPS nonsense with per-publication fees and horrible Flash panels, clumsy workflow and annoying non-native AIR-based utilities instead of letting everybody output to HTML5. In the next update, an item in the pages panel flyout menu showed up, I think under the Spread Attributes, which was related to HTML5 output, which never had any practical purpose and has subsequently been removed again recently if I recall correctly. That feature never saw the light of day as far as I am aware.
#Indesign cc 2015 no printers full
They once had a technology preview of In5-type HTML5 export with full support for liquid layouts quite some time ago (it’s probably still on youtube or AdobeTV). The script asks you to choose a folder to save the HTML files into, and then names each file the same as the InDesign file with an html filename extension. When used in a script, it outputs the file as an HTML with proper supporting CSS and JavaScript to a “fixed layout” type of HTML format, that looks and behaves just like a fixed layout EPUB, with the big exception that each page is output as a single HTML file. Animation added via the Animation and Timing panels appears to be fully supported, as well as text and object hyperlinks.Ĭlick here to download a script you can use to try this out for yourself. Lo and behold, this command adds an undocumented export type to InDesign.
Wondering what “XHTML FXL format” is, I decided to try it with a simple script. The documentation for the command simply says “Exports to XHTML FXL format.”
This command didn’t exist in previous versions of InDesign. I was digging around in the InDesign CC 2015 “Object Model” today while working on a complicated script project, and I ran across this:įor those unfamiliar with scripting, this might not look like much.
0 kommentar(er)
